Organization of Publications in CV

Hello y'all!

I know that it's best to be clear on the CV about stating which publications are not peer-reviewed manuscripts, but I am noticing mine looks a little crowded as a result. For example, it reads like this:

Peer Reviewed Articles
Article 1 citation
Article 2 citation

Research Monographs
Research Monograph 1

Encyclopedia Entries
Encyclopedia Entry 1

Book Chapters
Book Chapter 1

I am wondering since, at this stage in my career, it would be better to just have an overall heading and lump everything together like this (organized by year), so it's easier to see visually. But I don't want to mislead people or try to look like I have more peer-reviewed manuscripts than I have. Also, the book chapter and encyclopedia entries went through a peer-review process, the research monograph did not since it was a grant evaluation published and given to the institution.

This is what I would like to do, if appropriate:

Publications
Encyclopedia Entry 1
Research Monograph 1
Article 1 citation
Article 2 citation
Book Chapter 1

Thanks for the advice!

This entry passed through the Full-Text RSS service - if this is your content and you're reading it on someone else's site, please read the FAQ at http://ift.tt/jcXqJW.

Organization of Publications in CV